Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:51:55 07/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2001 at 13:11:48, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>On July 07, 2001 at 09:44:08, Martin Müller wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>It is quite sad to see a famous program as DJ7 to loose that _way_. Not the loss
>>is important. But how it looses. The evalutaion differed up to 3 or more pawns
>>against several reputated programs. It makes me think that the evaluation of the
>>program is not quite correct. Just see that:
>>
>>{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\fonttbl{\f0\froman FigurineCB AriesSP;}{\f1\fnil
>>DiagramTTFritz;}}{\info{\author
>>Müller,Martin}{\creatim\yr2001\mo7\dy7\hr15\min38}}\fs20 {\pard \ql {\b \fs24
>>(455) Deep Shredder,G - Deep Junior 7 [E48]\par}{\plain \fs20 Level=Blitz:60'.
>>Z\'FCrich, 07.07.2001\par}}{\qj {\b {\plain \fs20 716MB, j7book.ctg. LINKS
>> }1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nge2 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
>>9.0\'960 0\'960 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.a3 Be7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Nc3 Qd7 {\plain \fs20
>>0.10/16 2:34 }14.Qc2 Nxd4 {\plain \fs20 0.33/18 1:47 }15.Bxh7+ Kh8 {\plain
>>\fs20 0.37/19 1:58 }16.Bxd4 Qxd4 {\plain \fs20 0.48/17 51 }17.Rad1 Qh4
>>{\plain \fs20 0.43/17 2:10 }18.Be4 Bd7 {\plain \fs20 0.52/17 2:16 }19.Rd3
>>e5 {\plain \fs20 0.00/17 5 }20.Bxb7 Rab8 {\plain \fs20 0.36/15 49 }21.Be4
>>g6 {\plain \fs20 0.39/16 1:25 }22.b4 Be6 {\plain \fs20 0.44/16 2:00
>>}23.Nd5 Bd6 {\plain \fs20 0.52/14 1:08 }24.Rfd1 Rdc8 {\plain \fs20 0.57/16
>>2:34 }25.Qe2 Kg7 {\plain \fs20 0.72/16 1:50 }26.g3 Qh8 {\plain \fs20
>>0.87/16 40 }27.Qe3 Bg4 {\plain \fs20 1.08/16 3:24 }28.Re1 Bh3 {\plain \fs20
>> 1.24/17 1:39 }29.Qxa7 Qf8 {\plain \fs20 1.30/17 1:52 }30.Qe3 Rd8 {\plain
>>\fs20 1.29/16 1:55 }31.Red1 Qe8 {\plain \fs20 1.30/16 1:30 }32.Bf3 Qe6
>>{\plain \fs20 1.40/16 55 }33.Nc3 Bc7 {\plain \fs20 1.11/16 48 }34.Rxd8
>>Bxd8 {\plain \fs20 0.00/18 5 }35.Nd5 Qf5 {\plain \fs20 1.37/18 2:36 }36.a4
>>Bg5 {\plain \fs20 1.42/17 2:34 }37.Qe2 Rc8 {\plain \fs20 1.50/17 1:01
>>}38.a5 Rc2 {\plain \fs20 1.98/18 5 }39.Ne3 Bxe3 {\plain \fs20 0.00/19 5
>>}40.Qxe3 Ra2 {\plain \fs20 0.00/18 5 }41.Bd5 Ra4 {\plain \fs20 0.00/18 5
>>}42.Qc3 Qh5 {\plain \fs20 2.07/16 10 }43.Re1 Qf5 {\plain \fs20 0.00/18 6
>>}44.Bb3 Ra3 {\plain \fs20 2.27/17 41 }45.Qb2 Qf3 {\plain \fs20 2.40/18 3:06
>> }46.Qxe5+ Qf6 {\plain \fs20 #1/20 5 }47.Qxf6+ Kxf6 {\plain \fs20 #1/21 6
>>}48.Bd5 Bd7 {\plain \fs20 2.48/21 5 }49.f4 Bb5 {\plain \fs20 2.32/17 30
>>}50.Rc1 Ke7 {\plain \fs20 2.68/18 26 }51.Kf2 Ra4 {\plain \fs20 2.37/17 43
>>}52.Re1+ Kf6 {\plain \fs20 2.37/18 44 }53.Rb1 Ke7 {\plain \fs20 0.00/21 5
>>}54.Ke3 f6 {\plain \fs20 2.69/18 1:27 }55.Kd4 Kd6 {\plain \fs20 2.80/21 5
>>}56.Bf7 g5 {\plain \fs20 2.62/17 33 }57.h4 gxh4 {\plain \fs20 2.62/16 29
>>}58.gxh4 Ra3 {\plain \fs20 0.00/21 5 }59.Bb3 Bd7 {\plain \fs20 0.00/21 5
>>}60.h5 Bf5 {\plain \fs20 3.19/21 5 }61.Rb2 Kc7 {\plain \fs20 0.00/20 5
>>}62.h6 Kb8 {\plain \fs20 3.54/18 1:00 }63.Bd5 Kc7 {\plain \fs20 0.00/19 5
>>}64.Rb3 Ra1 {\plain \fs20 0.00/21 5 }65.Rc3+ Kb8{\plain \fs20 4.40/18 3 }
>>1\'960}\par \par}\par}
>>
>>Deep Shredder,G - Deep Junior 7 [E48]
>>Level=Blitz:60'. Zürich, 07.07.2001
>>
>> 716MB, j7book.ctg. LINKS
>> 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nge2 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
>>9.0-0 0-0 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.a3 Be7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Nc3 Qd7 0.10/16 2:34 14.Qc2
>>Nxd4 0.33/18 1:47 15.Bxh7+ Kh8 0.37/19 1:58 16.Bxd4 Qxd4 0.48/17 51
>>17.Rad1 Qh4 0.43/17 2:10 18.Be4 Bd7 0.52/17 2:16 19.Rd3 e5 0.00/17 5
>>20.Bxb7 Rab8 0.36/15 49 21.Be4 g6 0.39/16 1:25 22.b4 Be6 0.44/16 2:00
>>23.Nd5 Bd6 0.52/14 1:08 24.Rfd1 Rdc8 0.57/16 2:34 25.Qe2 Kg7 0.72/16
>>1:50 26.g3 Qh8 0.87/16 40 27.Qe3 Bg4 1.08/16 3:24 28.Re1 Bh3 1.24/17
>>1:39 29.Qxa7 Qf8 1.30/17 1:52 30.Qe3 Rd8 1.29/16 1:55 31.Red1 Qe8
>>1.30/16 1:30 32.Bf3 Qe6 1.40/16 55 33.Nc3 Bc7 1.11/16 48 34.Rxd8 Bxd8
>>0.00/18 5 35.Nd5 Qf5 1.37/18 2:36 36.a4 Bg5 1.42/17 2:34 37.Qe2 Rc8
>>1.50/17 1:01 38.a5 Rc2 1.98/18 5 39.Ne3 Bxe3 0.00/19 5 40.Qxe3 Ra2
>>0.00/18 5 41.Bd5 Ra4 0.00/18 5 42.Qc3 Qh5 2.07/16 10 43.Re1 Qf5 0.00/18
>> 6 44.Bb3 Ra3 2.27/17 41 45.Qb2 Qf3 2.40/18 3:06 46.Qxe5+ Qf6 #1/20 5
>>47.Qxf6+ Kxf6 #1/21 6 48.Bd5 Bd7 2.48/21 5 49.f4 Bb5 2.32/17 30 50.Rc1
>>Ke7 2.68/18 26 51.Kf2 Ra4 2.37/17 43 52.Re1+ Kf6 2.37/18 44 53.Rb1 Ke7
>>0.00/21 5 54.Ke3 f6 2.69/18 1:27 55.Kd4 Kd6 2.80/21 5 56.Bf7 g5 2.62/17
>> 33 57.h4 gxh4 2.62/16 29 58.gxh4 Ra3 0.00/21 5 59.Bb3 Bd7 0.00/21 5
>>60.h5 Bf5 3.19/21 5 61.Rb2 Kc7 0.00/20 5 62.h6 Kb8 3.54/18 1:00 63.Bd5
>>Kc7 0.00/19 5 64.Rb3 Ra1 0.00/21 5 65.Rc3+ Kb8 4.40/18 3 1-0
>>
>>Or
>>
>>Century 3 viz Deep Junior 7
>>
>>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Ng-e2 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
>>9.O-O O-O 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.a3 Be7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Nc3 Qd7 14.Qc2 Nxd4 15.Bxh7+ Kh8
>>16.Bxd4 Qxd4 17.Ra-d1 Qh4 18.Be4 Bd7 19.Rd3 e5 20.Bxb7 Ra-b8 21.Be4 g6 22.b4 Be6
>>23.Nd5 Bd6 24.Rf-d1 Rd-c8 25.Qe2 Kg7 26.g3 Qh8 27.Qe3 Bg4 28.Re1 Bh3 29.Qxa7 Qf8
>>30.Qe3 Rc-d8 31.Re-d1 Qe8 32.Bf3 Qe6 33.Nc3 Bc7 34.Rd3xd8 Bxd8 35.Nd5 Qf5 36.a4
>>Bg5 37.Qe2 Rc8 38.a5 Rc2 39.Ne3 Bxe3 40.Qxe3 Ra2 41.Bd5 Ra4 42.Qc3 Qh5 43.Re1
>>Qf5 44.Bb3 Ra3 45.Qb2 Qf3 46.Qxe5+ Qf6 47.Qxf6+ Kxf6 48.Bd5 Bd7 49.f4 Bb5 50.Rc1
>>Ke7 51.Kf2 Ra4 52.Re1+ Kf6 53.Rb1 Ke7 54.Ke3 f6 55.Kd4 Kd6 56.Bf7 g5 57.h4 gxh4
>>58.gxh4 Ra3 59.Bb3 Bd7 60.h5 Bf5 61.Rb2 Kc7 62.h6 Kb8 63.Bd5 Kc7 64.Rb3 Ra1
>>65.Rc3+ Kb8 66.Rc6 Resigns
>>
>>
>>Century 3 on a mûch slower 1 processor computer.
>>
>>
>>DJ7 does not see the problems it seems. What is wrong with DJ7?
>>
>>Regards
>>Martin
>
>Hello all!
>
>(I play too by this tournament with Nimzo 8x)
>
>I cannot some moves from Dj7 understand!
>
>In first game against Century x, was the theoretical move 12.e4 an "bad move".
>Stronger for withe is 12.Ne4! After 12.e4 e5! have black a better chance!
>
>In game 2 I can with all my programs move 18...Bd7? not find! It was a bad move
>too! Better was 18...f5 or Bd6, or not?
>
>Have somebody Dj7 and can post a analysis by Dj7 in this position:
>
>[D]r1br3k/pp2bpp1/4p3/8/4B2q/P1N5/1PQ2PPP/3R1RK1 b - - 0 18
>
>Thanks,
>Eduard
Here is some analysis of Junior7 on a slow p200(I told it time control of 10
hours/40 moves)
blass,u - Junior 7
r1br3k/pp2bpp1/4p3/8/4B2q/P1N5/1PQ2PPP/3R1RK1 b - - 0 1
Analysis by Junior 7:
1...Bd6 2.h3
= (-0.24) Depth: 3 00:00:00
1...Bd6 2.h3
= (-0.24) Depth: 3 00:00:00
1...Bd6 2.g3 Qh5 3.Rfe1 Qh3
= (-0.02) Depth: 6 00:00:00 14kN
1...Bd6 2.g3
² (0.28) Depth: 9 00:00:01 111kN
1...Rxd1 2.Rxd1 a5 3.g3 Qh3 4.Bg2 Qh5 5.Rd4
² (0.26) Depth: 9 00:00:02 234kN
1...Rxd1 2.Rxd1 f5 3.Rd3 Qf6 4.Rh3+ Kg8 5.Bf3 Qd4 6.Ne2 Qd6
² (0.51) Depth: 12 00:00:10 1369kN
1...Bd6 2.g3 Qh5 3.Rd3 a5 4.Qd1 Qxd1 5.Rfxd1 Ra6 6.Rd4
= (0.19) Depth: 12 00:00:24 3413kN
1...Bd6 2.g3
² (0.49) Depth: 15 00:02:57 24328kN
1...Bd7 2.Bxb7 Rab8 3.Be4 g6 4.g3 Qh3 5.Bg2 Qh5 6.Rfe1
² (0.34) Depth: 15 00:03:31 28960kN
1...Bd7 2.Rd3 e5 3.Rf3 Bf6 4.Bxb7 Rab8 5.Bd5 Bg4 6.Rg3 Kg8 7.Qg6
² (0.52) Depth: 17 00:11:40 90481kN
1...Bd6 2.g3 Qh5 3.Rd3 Qe5 4.Rfd1 a5 5.h4 Ra6 6.Re3 Qc5
² (0.49) Depth: 17 00:16:15 122109kN
(blass, tel-aviv 07.07.2001)
It means that Junior7 at tournament time control on faster hardware can probably
avoid Bd7.
Note that Deep Junior could not see at depth 17 that Bd6 is 0.03 pawns better
than Bd7 based on the pgn that was posted so it seems that depth 17 of Junior7
is better than depth 17 of Deep Junior.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.