Author: Mark Young
Date: 12:22:11 07/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2001 at 13:48:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 07, 2001 at 12:32:39, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>Do we really have to discuss the same subject over and over again? Why can't you >>guys stop with this? You (among others) think the comps are GM-strength >>(although nobody seems to care to come up with a definition). Bob (among others) >>think they're not. Different people, different opinion. So what? >>Let's stop this? > >The reason for this prolonged subject is that it doesn't require a lot of >original thought, which is also apparent from the tedious repetition of messages >by certain persons. I imagine that the sole contribution by some people to this >forum consists of this single subject and that they would run around like >headless chickens without it. So by opposing that viewpoint we're doing them a >favor, though at the expense of silence. One could say that Hyatt is the modern >version of the good samaritan :-). > >Apart from that it's an purely imaginary discussion placed in a fictional >setting with little or no importance whatsoever. > >Mogens. Then I suggest you don't post to certain persons threads that talk about this subject since you dislike it so much. Why bitch about chess talk and computer strength in a computer chess forum. If you don't like this subject start one of your own....because some here do want to discuss this subject. Certain persons here may not like the facts and the results shown, that shows how wrong their opinion on this subject are, but thats life.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.