Author: odell hall
Date: 21:53:14 07/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2001 at 15:07:05, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: >A Quack? Hrm. let's see who the quack is here: > >1. Number of people helped to create chess programs: > Bob: Hundreds (including myself) > Odell: none (as far as I can see) > >2. Number of world class chess programs written: > Bob: Several (Crafty, Cray Blitz, probably others) > Odell: None again > >3. Number of technical questions answered regarding computer chess: > Bob: Thousands (RGCC, RGC, on ICC, and here) > Odell: Given the beneit fo doubt, a couple > >4. Number of programs released *entirely* to the public > Bob: One world class program (Crafty) > Odell: Absolutely none again > >5. Number of people who recognize as a clear and respected expert in computer >chess: > Bob: Just about everybody > Odell: None > >6. Number of PhDs in Computer Science held: > Bob: 1 > Odell: None again > >Perhaps you can tell me again how Bob looks like a quack, and you don't? > >Chris > > > > >On July 06, 2001 at 01:15:44, odell hall wrote: > >>Hey Chris I hope you see this post, >> >> In the face of conjectures you are the only one here who has used Facts to >>support your point of view, even as you left tiger performed at the 2700 elo >>level, silencing all your critics. Dr. Hyatt is looking more and more like a >>Quack. Hahahaha, i can't believe you actually took the time to write this nonsense! Writing a Chess Program doesn't make you God, nor does it mean you cannot be wrong.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.