Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:55:02 07/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2001 at 00:53:11, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On July 08, 2001 at 00:07:12, Curtis Williams wrote: > >>2833 KillerMachi(C) 3451 JRLOK(GM) 3275 KillerMachi(C) >>2829 Crawly(C) 3443 SpitFire(C) 3135 Weezer(C) >>2811 SandmanJr(C) 3429 scrappy(C) 3082 Foe-hammer(C) >>2738 EvilSilicon(C) 3375 Netsurfer(C) 3022 CraftyWiz(C) >>2726 Colossus(C) 3363 ChessBeta(C) 2970 Trojanx(C) >>2718 Aegis(C) 3314 RebelRex(C) 2954 Colossus(C) >>2713 ShredderX(C) 3309 L-Aronian(GM) 2947 diep(C) >>2711 Good-Boy(C) 3297 KillerMachi(C) 2935 Good-Boy(C) >>2703 OzsO(C) 3292 lorenzo(GM) 2902 heatstroke(C) >>2699 heatstroke(C) 3225 garompon(GM) 2902 valheru(C) >>2696 kooloo(C) 3222 valheru(C) 2878 Hawkeye(GM) >>2686 valheru(C) 3210 Weezer(C) 2871 Aegis(C) >>2676 Spendrups(C) 3201 bonvivant 2867 Rabin(IM) >>2669 BountyHunte(C) 3197 junior(GM) 2858 PIECEOFFCHI(C) >>2651 Wansi(C) 3187 Dreev(GM) 2833 LarryC(GM) >>2643 JRLOK(GM) 3180 Hawkeye(GM) 2827 giant-c(C) >>2641 JrChess 3169 swimmer(C) 2823 Wansi(C) >>2636 BrazilianMa(C) 3152 jeleen(GM) 2811 Gela(GM) >>2625 Foe-hammer(C) 3144 NewZorro(GM) 2793 Crawly(C) >>2622 Talmoves(C) 3141 Irina(GM) 2790 troii(C) >>2620 Eyssa(C) 3141 YearOfTheR(FM) 2780 Tiger14(C) >>2611 Deveraux(C) 3140 mikenty(IM) 2779 Lohman(C) >>Supe > >There's no text so I don't know what you are trying to imply by this. If you >are trying to say that Tiger is strong, Tiger is strong. However, there are >some facts about the account that should be made known: I would assume he is the owner of Spitfire and is simply happy that it is now the highest rated computer account. >1) It only plays humans. >2) It only plays people rated in excess of almost 3100. 2) It according to it's finger notes plays within -350 rating points, which while in this case it may be 3100 that is naturally due to it's own rating increase. >Basically it only plays people who are on the "best" list. So this is yet >another "human-only" rating pig in the mold of Scrappy, the kind that is making >it very difficult for a program that plays a wide range of opponents to find any >titled humans to play. Seems there are more than usual right now seeking to only play humans. >I think that approximately any good program could get that high on the list if >it trolled for people who wanted to get punished. I am not sure of the need to say trolled, these accounts seek to play humans, if the human players accept the seek that's a choice. Not sure it's trolling. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.