Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 11:32:32 07/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2001 at 15:22:11, Mark Young wrote: >On July 07, 2001 at 13:48:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On July 07, 2001 at 12:32:39, Daniel Clausen wrote: >> >>>Do we really have to discuss the same subject over and over again? Why can't you >>>guys stop with this? You (among others) think the comps are GM-strength >>>(although nobody seems to care to come up with a definition). Bob (among others) >>>think they're not. Different people, different opinion. So what? >>>Let's stop this? >> >>The reason for this prolonged subject is that it doesn't require a lot of >>original thought, which is also apparent from the tedious repetition of messages >>by certain persons. I imagine that the sole contribution by some people to this >>forum consists of this single subject and that they would run around like >>headless chickens without it. So by opposing that viewpoint we're doing them a >>favor, though at the expense of silence. One could say that Hyatt is the modern >>version of the good samaritan :-). >> >>Apart from that it's an purely imaginary discussion placed in a fictional >>setting with little or no importance whatsoever. >> >>Mogens. > >Then I suggest you don't post to certain persons threads that talk about this >subject since you dislike it so much. Why bitch about chess talk and computer >strength in a computer chess forum. If you don't like this subject start one of >your own....because some here do want to discuss this subject. Certain persons >here may not like the facts and the results shown, that shows how wrong their >opinion on this subject are, but thats life. The interesting thing about opinins is that they're usually not right or wrong. You have an opinion, other people have a different opinion. But your opinion isn't the right one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.