Author: Kurt Widmann
Date: 13:28:57 07/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2001 at 15:55:38, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On July 08, 2001 at 15:45:52, Ian Aston wrote: > >>On July 08, 2001 at 14:55:27, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>IMO CHESS is 99% tactics (Richard TEICHMANN opinion too). >> >>Is this a typo or has your opinion shifted. In quite a few of your previous >>posts you have used a figure of 90% tactics. >> >>> >>>Regards. > >Hi Ian, >You are a good observer indeed. >Let's say that the difference between 90 and 99 is not so important...that was >just to stress the argument. >In my final opinion probably I would go for 94.5 % (just to make an average). ;) > >Regards. Where to you fit a 28 move deep bookline as played by Fritz etc. into your puzzle? Also the usage of endgame bases. As well as engine lerning function to avoid certain moves as done by crafty etc. If you define these under tactics,then 99% may be more accurate. Kurt Widmann
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.