Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: One mate to solve... Correction!!

Author: leonid

Date: 17:44:00 07/08/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 08, 2001 at 18:41:24, Heiner Marxen wrote:

>On July 07, 2001 at 17:19:27, Angrim wrote:
>
>>On July 07, 2001 at 15:21:38, leonid wrote:
>>
>>>On July 07, 2001 at 15:19:07, leonid wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 07, 2001 at 12:47:12, leonid wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi!
>>
>>>>Since I could see that for the first position solution was found more easily
>>>>that I expected, I will write the next one in graphics. Maybe it also will be
>>>>solved easily. My program was slow in it. It could be that somebody will say me
>>>>if in second position mate for black side was also found. For blacks I don't
>>>>know.
>>>>
>>>>[D]q2k2q1/1r1q1r1B/nRqQqRn1/NqQbQqN1/QQ1K1QQ1/Q5Q1/p5pb/8 w - -
>>>>
>>>>Please indicate your result.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Leonid.
>>That one is tough.
>>proved that move g5xf7 wins, 16 turns
>>PN2:63023734 evals, 1486467 expands, 893.16 seconds
>>Angrim
>
>Yes, tough.  Chest used 4.3 hours on a K7/600 just to find that there is no
>mate in 10 moves.  Since the effective branching factor is just below 5,
>I'm not going to get much more results.  You win :-)

Thanks, Heiner! Now I see that possible shortest mate could be only in 11 and 12
moves. In 13 mate is for sure.

Cheers,
Leonid.


>Cheers,
>Heiner



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.