Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:37:53 07/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2001 at 10:19:19, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 09, 2001 at 08:41:04, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Hello Mogens, >>Now here is a new one to add to my list of "Why computers are not GM's". If we >>take away their opening book, take away their EGTB and take away the latest >>hardware and send them out to get their GM title they probably will not get it. > >Hello Jim, > >Of course they can, as partially demonstrated by Tiger. I think it's very >relevant to determine if a computer program can demonstrate GM strength without >depending on various databases and state of the art hardware. Similar issues >will be forced at some point anyway if computer programs are to participate in >human tournaments in the future (IMO). Not that it would be a great loss. > >Regards, >Mogens I don't believe Tiger played without an opening book. And it might have even used EGTBs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.