Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Borland C++ Builder 5 Standard version, question.

Author: Pham Minh Tri

Date: 15:35:19 08/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 02, 2001 at 13:52:42, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On August 02, 2001 at 13:29:20, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>
>>I have finally decided to start writing my own chessengine and i have seen
>>over and over again that C++ is the "right" language to use, my question is:
>
>Why C++? You can do it in C just fine. I think is just a matter of taste.
[snip]

Why C? You can do it better in Assembly ;-)

Choose Assembly if you enjoy hard working, choose C++ if you want the most
effective language. C is in middle.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.