Author: Harald Faber
Date: 07:32:24 07/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 10, 2001 at 07:49:16, Mark Young wrote: >I have seen some bad GambitTiger results against humans, even >though GambitTiger is rated higer in computer vs computer game then ChessTiger. The better result of GambitTiger in the SSDF is easy to explain: GambitTiger is tested under the own ChessPartner GUI and the *own, adjusted book* while ChessTiger 14 is tested in the ChessBase version which has a different book than the ChessPartner versions of Tiger have. >The question then is is it really better to have a risky style of play such as >Junior 7 and GambitTiger, then the more solid style of a ChessTiger or Fritz 7 >when playing humans or computers in terms of results. Yes and no. Yes if the programs can manage to reach dynamic positions, no if the humans can keep the position closed.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.