Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Redacting the ECM suite

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 09:51:16 05/02/98

Go up one level in this thread



On May 02, 1998 at 11:34:38, Howard Exner wrote:

>On May 01, 1998 at 14:38:14, Don Dailey wrote:

>>B) Solution  should  not be   an  obvious move   that any program  has
>>   some  chance  of  playing even if  it doesn't really understand the
>>   idea.
>
>On this point B I recognized some key moves as being played to achieve a
>draw
>rather than seeing deeper that they are winning. Botvinnik's Ba3 against
>Capablanca comes to mind. Would this be the kind of example you are
>referring
>to?

It'd be awful to throw out a good position like this just because after
X seconds some programs score it as 0 rather than +3, right?

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.