Author: Howard Exner
Date: 10:40:31 05/02/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 1998 at 12:51:16, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On May 02, 1998 at 11:34:38, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On May 01, 1998 at 14:38:14, Don Dailey wrote: > >>>B) Solution should not be an obvious move that any program has >>> some chance of playing even if it doesn't really understand the >>> idea. >> >>On this point B I recognized some key moves as being played to achieve a >>draw >>rather than seeing deeper that they are winning. Botvinnik's Ba3 against >>Capablanca comes to mind. Would this be the kind of example you are >>referring >>to? > >It'd be awful to throw out a good position like this just because after >X seconds some programs score it as 0 rather than +3, right? Definitely keep this one of course, as Don suggests too(ie: as Don said keep it if it doesn't really understand the idea). Why did you think I wanted to toss it? > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.