Author: Pierre Bourget
Date: 09:10:57 07/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2001 at 11:52:33, Christoph Fieberg wrote: >On July 11, 2001 at 11:33:10, Pierre Bourget wrote: > >>On July 11, 2001 at 10:55:22, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>500Mhz Laptop >>>bm Bxh7+ - NOLOT.EPD >>> >>>[D] r3rbk1/ppq2ppp/2b1pB2/8/6Q1/1P1B3P/P1P2PP1/R2R2K1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Fritz 6: >>> >>>1.Bxg7-- >>> µ (-1.16) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>>1.Bxg7-- Bxg7 >>> -+ (-2.12) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>>1.Bxh7+! >>> -+ (-2.06) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>>1.c3! >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>>1.c3! >>> ² (0.47) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >>>1.c3 b5 >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 2/5 00:00:00 >>>1.c3 b5 2.a3 >>> ² (0.47) Depth: 3/7 00:00:00 >>>1.c3 e5 2.Qf5 e4 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 1kN >>>1.Qh5! >>> ² (0.47) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 2kN >>>1.Qh5 h6 2.Be5 Bd6 3.Bh7+ Kxh7 4.Rxd6 >>> ² (0.59) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 6kN >>>1.Qh5 g6 2.Be5 Qb6 3.Qg4 Red8 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 6/19 00:00:00 17kN >>>1.Qh5 g6 2.Qh4 Bg7 3.c3 Bxf6 4.Qxf6 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 7/17 00:00:00 70kN >>>1.c4! >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 7/18 00:00:00 97kN >>>1.Re1! >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 184kN >>>1.Re1! Rac8 2.Be5 Qe7 3.c4 Red8 >>> ² (0.50) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 219kN >>>1.Re1 b5 2.Be5 Qe7 3.c4 Rad8 4.Rad1 >>> ² (0.47) Depth: 8/26 00:00:01 410kN >>>1.Re1 g6 2.Rad1 Bg7 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.a3 Rad8 5.c3 e5 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 9/25 00:00:03 1234kN >>>1.Re1 g6 2.Rad1 e5 3.Be4 Bg7 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Bxc6 Qxc6 >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 10/26 00:00:07 2531kN >>>1.Re1 g6 2.Rad1 Bg7 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.b4 e5 5.c4 Rad8 >>> ² (0.34) Depth: 11/27 00:00:16 5653kN >>>1.Rd2! >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 11/27 00:00:24 8767kN >>>1.Rd2 e5 2.Rad1 e4 3.Bc4 b5 4.Be2 Rac8 5.c3 e3 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 12/27 00:00:34 12608kN >>>1.Re1! >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 12/29 00:00:40 14821kN >>>1.b4! >>> ² (0.44) Depth: 12/29 00:00:54 19802kN >>>1.b4! g6 2.b5 Bd7 3.Be2 Bc8 4.Qa4 e5 5.b6 Qc6 >>> ² (0.56) Depth: 12/31 00:01:16 28190kN >>>1.b4 Qb6 2.b5 Bxb5 3.Rdb1 Bxd3 4.Rxb6 Bf5 5.Qg3 axb6 >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 13/33 00:02:58 66147kN >>>1.b4 Qb6 2.a3 e5 3.Bg5 e4 4.Bc4 Ba4 5.Be3 Qc7 >>> ² (0.41) Depth: 14/35 00:05:17 118881kN >>>1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 g6 4.a3 Bg7 5.Bxg7 Kxg7 >>> ² (0.34) Depth: 15/37 00:19:52 456600kN >>>1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 g6 4.Rab1 Ba4 5.Re1 a5 >>> ² (0.31) Depth: 16/37 00:31:25 729779kN >>>1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 g6 4.Rab1 Ba4 5.Rd2 Bh6 >>> ² (0.38) Depth: 17/39 01:16:04 1807674kN >>>1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 e4 4.a4 e3 5.fxe3 Rxe3 >>> ² (0.31) Depth: 18/43 03:08:06 4535856kN >>>1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.b5 e4 4.Be2 Re6 5.Bg5 Be8 >>> ² (0.28) Depth: 19/45 07:34:56 11000312kN >>>1.b4 a6 2.c4 g6 3.Qg5 Ba4 4.Rdc1 Be7 5.c5 Rad8 >>> = (0.25) Depth: 20/46 24:10:39 35603334kN >>>1.Bxh7+! >>> ² (0.28) Depth: 20/49 32:29:19 48172103kN >>>1.Bxh7+! >>> ² (0.59) Depth: 21/46 35:24:52 52617477kN >>> >>> >>>my 800Mhz athlon would only shave a few hours off this despite more speed and >>>256MB for Hash tables instead of 64 for the laptop. >> >>What is the winning line ? After Bxh7+ Kxh7 Qh5+ Kg8 Rd4 Bf3! followed by Qxc2 >>and Qg6 i don't see how white is winning ,only a slight edge perhaps. >> >>Pierre > >1.Bxh7+ 1...Kxh7 2.Qh5+ Kg8 3.Rd4 gxf6 4.Rg4+ Bg7 5.Qh6 Kf8 6.Rxg7 Be4 7.Qxf6 >Red8 [7...Rac8 8.Qg5 Bg6 9.Qh6 Qxc2 10.Rxg6+ Ke7 11.Qh4+ Kd7 12.Qd4+] 8.Qg5 +- > >Regards, >Christoph But 3....gxf6 is bad i think, better is 3....Bf3 ! . Pierre
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.