Author: Mike S.
Date: 10:01:29 07/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2001 at 12:10:57, Pierre Bourget wrote: >On July 11, 2001 at 11:52:33, Christoph Fieberg wrote: >>>>[D] r3rbk1/ppq2ppp/2b1pB2/8/6Q1/1P1B3P/P1P2PP1/R2R2K1 w - - 0 1 >>1.Bxh7+ 1...Kxh7 2.Qh5+ Kg8 3.Rd4 gxf6 4.Rg4+ Bg7 5.Qh6 Kf8 6.Rxg7 Be4 7.Qxf6 >>Red8 [7...Rac8 8.Qg5 Bg6 9.Qh6 Qxc2 10.Rxg6+ Ke7 11.Qh4+ Kd7 12.Qd4+] 8.Qg5 +- >But 3....gxf6 is bad i think, better is 3....Bf3 ! . I've analysed a bit with Little Goliath 2000a (which is a strong tactician) and Hiarcs 7.32, and I think you are right! But also after 3...gxf6, white doesn't get very much as it seems. Not enough to play this risky sac Bxh7+ here. Nolot #8 is not a good test position IMO. I wouldn't use it. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.