Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:10:12 07/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2001 at 10:55:22, Joshua Lee wrote: Diep is more lucky here probably with its extensions. If i turn on recaptures and a few more check extensions then DIEP needs 2 minutes to find Bxh7 (with the right score) at 10 ply, otherwise it needs 13 ply or so to find it (and depending upon the extensions that can take up to an hour). >500Mhz Laptop >bm Bxh7+ - NOLOT.EPD > >[D] r3rbk1/ppq2ppp/2b1pB2/8/6Q1/1P1B3P/P1P2PP1/R2R2K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1.Bxg7-- > µ (-1.16) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.Bxg7-- Bxg7 > -+ (-2.12) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.Bxh7+! > -+ (-2.06) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.c3! > = (-0.06) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.c3! > ² (0.47) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.c3 b5 > ² (0.41) Depth: 2/5 00:00:00 >1.c3 b5 2.a3 > ² (0.47) Depth: 3/7 00:00:00 >1.c3 e5 2.Qf5 e4 > ² (0.44) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 1kN >1.Qh5! > ² (0.47) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 2kN >1.Qh5 h6 2.Be5 Bd6 3.Bh7+ Kxh7 4.Rxd6 > ² (0.59) Depth: 5/11 00:00:00 6kN >1.Qh5 g6 2.Be5 Qb6 3.Qg4 Red8 > ² (0.38) Depth: 6/19 00:00:00 17kN >1.Qh5 g6 2.Qh4 Bg7 3.c3 Bxf6 4.Qxf6 > ² (0.38) Depth: 7/17 00:00:00 70kN >1.c4! > ² (0.41) Depth: 7/18 00:00:00 97kN >1.Re1! > ² (0.44) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 184kN >1.Re1! Rac8 2.Be5 Qe7 3.c4 Red8 > ² (0.50) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 219kN >1.Re1 b5 2.Be5 Qe7 3.c4 Rad8 4.Rad1 > ² (0.47) Depth: 8/26 00:00:01 410kN >1.Re1 g6 2.Rad1 Bg7 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.a3 Rad8 5.c3 e5 > ² (0.38) Depth: 9/25 00:00:03 1234kN >1.Re1 g6 2.Rad1 e5 3.Be4 Bg7 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Bxc6 Qxc6 > ² (0.44) Depth: 10/26 00:00:07 2531kN >1.Re1 g6 2.Rad1 Bg7 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.b4 e5 5.c4 Rad8 > ² (0.34) Depth: 11/27 00:00:16 5653kN >1.Rd2! > ² (0.38) Depth: 11/27 00:00:24 8767kN >1.Rd2 e5 2.Rad1 e4 3.Bc4 b5 4.Be2 Rac8 5.c3 e3 > ² (0.38) Depth: 12/27 00:00:34 12608kN >1.Re1! > ² (0.41) Depth: 12/29 00:00:40 14821kN >1.b4! > ² (0.44) Depth: 12/29 00:00:54 19802kN >1.b4! g6 2.b5 Bd7 3.Be2 Bc8 4.Qa4 e5 5.b6 Qc6 > ² (0.56) Depth: 12/31 00:01:16 28190kN >1.b4 Qb6 2.b5 Bxb5 3.Rdb1 Bxd3 4.Rxb6 Bf5 5.Qg3 axb6 > ² (0.41) Depth: 13/33 00:02:58 66147kN >1.b4 Qb6 2.a3 e5 3.Bg5 e4 4.Bc4 Ba4 5.Be3 Qc7 > ² (0.41) Depth: 14/35 00:05:17 118881kN >1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 g6 4.a3 Bg7 5.Bxg7 Kxg7 > ² (0.34) Depth: 15/37 00:19:52 456600kN >1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 g6 4.Rab1 Ba4 5.Re1 a5 > ² (0.31) Depth: 16/37 00:31:25 729779kN >1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 g6 4.Rab1 Ba4 5.Rd2 Bh6 > ² (0.38) Depth: 17/39 01:16:04 1807674kN >1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.Bf5 e4 4.a4 e3 5.fxe3 Rxe3 > ² (0.31) Depth: 18/43 03:08:06 4535856kN >1.b4 a6 2.c4 e5 3.b5 e4 4.Be2 Re6 5.Bg5 Be8 > ² (0.28) Depth: 19/45 07:34:56 11000312kN >1.b4 a6 2.c4 g6 3.Qg5 Ba4 4.Rdc1 Be7 5.c5 Rad8 > = (0.25) Depth: 20/46 24:10:39 35603334kN >1.Bxh7+! > ² (0.28) Depth: 20/49 32:29:19 48172103kN >1.Bxh7+! > ² (0.59) Depth: 21/46 35:24:52 52617477kN > > >my 800Mhz athlon would only shave a few hours off this despite more speed and >256MB for Hash tables instead of 64 for the laptop.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.