Author: Mike S.
Date: 16:11:58 07/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2001 at 18:57:27, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On July 11, 2001 at 13:12:58, Mike S. wrote: > >So little goliath doesn't find the right solution. it plays it >because of some patzer scores in its PSQ tables. This conclusion comes way too early... You would have to actually *play* against it, to see what happens. The *1st* move of a pv is what really matters (the rest may come at the board, or may not), and this is the right one here. After all, it's a sac. You havo to see at least something, to start with giving away material. This type of testing is ok IMO, because the program which finds the correct 1st moves fastest, will be stronger than the program which takes much longer to switch to the best move, and produces a perfect pv up to ply 17 after 10 Minutes. That's why I do not pay too much attention to the pv in this type of test (if it's a good testing move only of course, not if it's a "normal" move...). How is Diep doing here? Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.