Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:14:56 07/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2001 at 05:52:51, Uri Blass wrote: <snipped> >>Junior is PSQ please use a non preprocessor you will see score drop >>to near zero at bigger depths when playing the line >> Nd5 cd Rd5 Nc4 Rf5 > >Junior7 is not a preprocessor. >Maybe you got the impression that Junior7 is a preprocessor from another post of >mine. > >I said that something surprised me because the evaluation after the move was >clearly different and I remember that I said that I believed that Junior is not >a preprocessor. > >I said that I believed that Junior is not a preprocessor in order to explain the >reason that I was surprised to see something and not in order to say that Junior >is a preprocessor. I see that I do not remember correctly what I said. Here is the quote from my post. "The main reason that it was surprising is the analysis after Nc3 Junior had no problem to see a clear advantage of more than 0.3 pawns for black in a short time after Nc3(depth 12 is enough) and never changed it's mind. I know that Junior is not a root processor so I expected it to get similiar evaluation before Nc3." I did not use the words that I thought that I probably used and I used the word "know" about Junior7. I thought that you got the impression that Junior7 is a preprocessor based on my post and it seems that I was wrong. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.