Author: odell hall
Date: 19:33:51 07/12/01
Who says computers have the positional understanding of a 2100??? In the game Junior 7 finds the Novelty played by Anand 11...Be7!! at about 1 min at depth 15 on my Thunderbird 1000, previous moves which has been played in this position are 11...nf6, bb7, h6. I tested a few other programs, (fritz, gambit tiger) they were unable to find the move. I am not 100% sure it is the best, but if Anand plays it, there has to definitely be something to it. Listening to the commentary I notice no one expected this move. How stupid can computers be to find a purely positional move that annand plays??? Morozevich,A - Anand,V r1b1k2r/2qp1ppp/p3pn2/1p2n3/1b1BP3/1NN2P2/PPPQ2PP/2KR1B1R b kq - 0 1 Analysis by Junior 7: 11...h5 12.Qg5 ² (0.36) Depth: 3 00:00:00 11...Nc6 12.Bxf6 gxf6 13.Qh6 Bxc3 = (0.21) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN 11...Nc6 12.Bxf6 gxf6 13.Qh6 Bxc3 = (0.21) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN 11...Nc6 12.Bxf6 gxf6 13.Qh6 Bxc3 = (0.21) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN 11...Nc6 12.Bxf6 gxf6 13.Qh6 Bxc3 14.bxc3 Bb7 ± (0.74) Depth: 9 00:00:00 56kN 11...h6 12.a3 Be7 13.f4 Nc4 14.Qf2 Bb7 = (0.17) Depth: 9 00:00:00 88kN 11...h6 12.a3 Bd6 13.Be3 Be7 14.Bf4 b4 15.axb4 Bxb4 16.Be2 = (0.16) Depth: 12 00:00:01 698kN 11...0-0 12.a3 Bd6 13.Be3 Be7 14.Bf4 b4 15.axb4 Bxb4 16.Be2 Bxc3 = (0.08) Depth: 12 00:00:04 2991kN 11...0-0 12.a3 Bd6 13.Bxb5 Bb7 14.Bf2 Bxa3 15.bxa3 Rfc8 16.Bc5 axb5 17.Nxb5 Qb8 ² (0.39) Depth: 15 00:00:17 12443kN 11...h6 12.a3 Bd6 13.Bb6 Qxb6 14.Qxd6 Qxd6 15.Rxd6 Ke7 16.Rd1 Nc6 17.Be2 = (0.16) Depth: 15 00:00:24 17059kN 11...Be7 12.Qf2 b4 13.Na4 d6 14.Nb6 Rb8 15.Nxc8 Qxc8 16.Be3 d5 = (0.02) Depth: 15 00:01:05 46644kN (hall, denver 12.07.2001)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.