Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question about Gerbil

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 21:06:13 07/12/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 12, 2001 at 15:25:21, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On July 12, 2001 at 13:53:01, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>However, the previous sentence says "if and only if" and therefore it is
>>required at all times. If a capture can be made, then there is an opposing side
>>pawn.  If a capture cannot be made there is none.  I also verified the meaning
>>with Steven J. Edwards.  At any rate, I have asked him to change the meaning for
>>the next iteration of the standard.
>
>If I say "A is true if B is true", A is true if B is true, and A is undefined if
>B is false.
>
>If I say "A is true if and only if B is true", A is true if B is true, and A is
>false if B is false.  But if A is false, that doesn't mean that B is false,
>which is what you contend.
>
>Of course, if the author of the document says that that's what he meant, then
>the meaning is clarified.
>
>But to specify that you *must* set the EP square to e3 on 1. e4 is dumb, and I
>wouldn't do it.
>
>It's troubling that two important standards are in the hands of someone who
>doesn't seem to have much time to maintain them, who is not really interested in
>hearing what others have to say about them, and who makes strange and pedantic
>decisions.
>
>I asked him if I could make be involved in discussion of the "new" PGN standard
>(about three years ago), and he essentially told me "no".  I can't remember his
>exact reason, but it was something to the effect that he was going to involve
>Bob and other important people.  I thought that was very strange.
>
>Meanwhile we have a PGN standard with a billion NAG's, which can't actually be
>used to correctly store an Informant game.
>
>bruce


I always wanted to be important.  :)

But I have never had _any_ discussions about a new PGN standard.  I did write
him a long while back about what I consider the "broken" EP field in the FEN
setup string...  I don't think it should be set if there is no pawn that can
make an ep capture.  I simply check this at present, produce a warning message
if I see an ep target with no possible capture, but I accept the position and
squash the ep target stuff to avoid breaking my search, which does this right.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.