Author: Christian Kongsted
Date: 07:05:32 07/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2001 at 22:33:51, odell hall wrote: >Who says computers have the positional understanding of a 2100??? In the game >Junior 7 finds the Novelty played by Anand 11...Be7!! at about 1 min at depth >15 on my Thunderbird 1000, previous moves which has been played in this position >are 11...nf6, bb7, h6. I tested a few other programs, (fritz, gambit tiger) >they were unable to find the move. I am not 100% sure it is the best, but if >Anand plays it, there has to definitely be something to it. Listening to the >commentary I notice no one expected this move. How stupid can computers be to >find a purely positional move that annand plays??? > > >Morozevich,A - Anand,V >r1b1k2r/2qp1ppp/p3pn2/1p2n3/1b1BP3/1NN2P2/PPPQ2PP/2KR1B1R b kq - 0 1 > The explanation may be tactical. White can play Kb1 threatening Nxb5 and therefore blacks has to do something about his B sooner or later...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.