Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 02:03:18 07/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2001 at 03:58:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: ><pre> > Tournament: Odyssey-Tournament >Place Name Sco MBch Buch Ws >------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 SHREDDER5, (1) 5.0 14 20 4 > 2-3 JUNIOR6A, (9) 4.5 15 21½ 3 > NIMZO8, (20) 4.5 13 20 4 > 4-6 DEEP FRITZ, (8) 4.0 15 22 2 > REBEL-CENTURY3, (10) 4.0 14 22 3 > GAMBIT-TIGER2.0, (2) 4.0 12 18 3 > 7-10 PATZER311B, (17) 3.5 16 24 2 > ZCHESS 2.2, (12) 3.5 12½ 16½ 2 > CHESSMASTER8000 1.0.2., (6) 3.5 12 17 3 > GANDALF432H, (11) 3.5 9 14½ 3 >11-16 CRAFTY 18.7, (19) 3.0 14 21 2 > MCHESS8, (23) 3.0 13½ 19½ 2 > YACE LEIDEN, (24) 3.0 12 17½ 2 > GROMIT 3.8.1, (26) 3.0 11½ 18 2 > HIARCS7.01, (4) 3.0 10½ 14½ 2 > REBEL-TIGER14, (3) 3.0 9½ 14 2 >17-21 WCHESS2000, (15) 2.5 12½ 19 1 > ZARKOV4.5R, (13) 2.5 11 17 1 > CHESS SYSTEM TAL2.03, (14) 2.5 10 16½ 1 > SHREDDER4 CHESSBITS, (5) 2.5 9½ 14 0 > SHREDDER4 CHESSBITS, (5) 2.5 9½ 14 0 > VIRTUAL-CHESS2, (7) 2.5 9 14 2 >22-23 GENIUS6.5 CZUB-STYLE, (21) 2.0 13½ 20 0 > LITTLE-GOLIATH2000V3, (16) 2.0 12 17½ 1 >24-25 COMET B35, (18) 1.5 11½ 18 1 > SOCRATES X, (22) 1.5 10 15 1 > 26 EUGEN7.92, (25) 0.5 12 17 0 ></pre> > > >surprise surprise :-)))) shredder leads the tournament. >very close is junior. i think nobody doubts this. >what might be a surprise (for others) could be nimzo8. >i have read many bad reviews about this program, because >it seems that in sweden it is not that good. >but here in my tournament, from the first game on my machine, >the program made a very good looking. >as i said from the first game i saw, the program plays better >than all nimzo versions i saw before. i was never a fan of nimzo, >from the time chrilly decided to stop the KNOWLEDGE path and turned >himself into writing a fast-search program. the program played >nonsense, stupid preprocessing main-lines, horrible decisions also >in permanent brain, wrong timing etc. >but nimzo 8 is different. >whatever others say, i still believe the program is stronger >than the version before. its after a long time of IMO timewasting >versions of nimzo a step into the right direction. >i really wonder how others come to their conclusions. how can they >come to 100 % diametral results ??? > Hi! Maybee, the simple reason for this is that you have followed six games and others houndreds or more. Maybee you should ask Chrilly what he thinks? Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.