Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 02:03:18 07/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2001 at 03:58:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: ><pre> > Tournament: Odyssey-Tournament >Place Name Sco MBch Buch Ws >------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 SHREDDER5, (1) 5.0 14 20 4 > 2-3 JUNIOR6A, (9) 4.5 15 21½ 3 > NIMZO8, (20) 4.5 13 20 4 > 4-6 DEEP FRITZ, (8) 4.0 15 22 2 > REBEL-CENTURY3, (10) 4.0 14 22 3 > GAMBIT-TIGER2.0, (2) 4.0 12 18 3 > 7-10 PATZER311B, (17) 3.5 16 24 2 > ZCHESS 2.2, (12) 3.5 12½ 16½ 2 > CHESSMASTER8000 1.0.2., (6) 3.5 12 17 3 > GANDALF432H, (11) 3.5 9 14½ 3 >11-16 CRAFTY 18.7, (19) 3.0 14 21 2 > MCHESS8, (23) 3.0 13½ 19½ 2 > YACE LEIDEN, (24) 3.0 12 17½ 2 > GROMIT 3.8.1, (26) 3.0 11½ 18 2 > HIARCS7.01, (4) 3.0 10½ 14½ 2 > REBEL-TIGER14, (3) 3.0 9½ 14 2 >17-21 WCHESS2000, (15) 2.5 12½ 19 1 > ZARKOV4.5R, (13) 2.5 11 17 1 > CHESS SYSTEM TAL2.03, (14) 2.5 10 16½ 1 > SHREDDER4 CHESSBITS, (5) 2.5 9½ 14 0 > SHREDDER4 CHESSBITS, (5) 2.5 9½ 14 0 > VIRTUAL-CHESS2, (7) 2.5 9 14 2 >22-23 GENIUS6.5 CZUB-STYLE, (21) 2.0 13½ 20 0 > LITTLE-GOLIATH2000V3, (16) 2.0 12 17½ 1 >24-25 COMET B35, (18) 1.5 11½ 18 1 > SOCRATES X, (22) 1.5 10 15 1 > 26 EUGEN7.92, (25) 0.5 12 17 0 ></pre> > > >surprise surprise :-)))) shredder leads the tournament. >very close is junior. i think nobody doubts this. >what might be a surprise (for others) could be nimzo8. >i have read many bad reviews about this program, because >it seems that in sweden it is not that good. >but here in my tournament, from the first game on my machine, >the program made a very good looking. >as i said from the first game i saw, the program plays better >than all nimzo versions i saw before. i was never a fan of nimzo, >from the time chrilly decided to stop the KNOWLEDGE path and turned >himself into writing a fast-search program. the program played >nonsense, stupid preprocessing main-lines, horrible decisions also >in permanent brain, wrong timing etc. >but nimzo 8 is different. >whatever others say, i still believe the program is stronger >than the version before. its after a long time of IMO timewasting >versions of nimzo a step into the right direction. >i really wonder how others come to their conclusions. how can they >come to 100 % diametral results ??? > Hi! Maybee, the simple reason for this is that you have followed six games and others houndreds or more. Maybee you should ask Chrilly what he thinks? Bertil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.