Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: English as a Programming language

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 08:53:51 07/14/01

Go up one level in this thread

On July 13, 2001 at 22:34:34, Dan Andersson wrote:

>I can't say that I agree about your assertions about functional programming
>languages, not now anyway. Both Common Lisp and OCaml rival the speed of C. Any
>problems with those languages are usually the result of naive implementations.


Your assertion that they can rival the speed of C is not too surprising, since
both OCaml and Common Lisp also support imperative programming. Any language
that effectively includes C as a subset can rival C in speed.

• Re: English as a Programming language Dan Andersson 09:19:29 07/14/01
  • Re: English as a Programming language Vincent Diepeveen 00:31:36 07/15/01
• Re: English as a Programming language (off topic) Heiner Marxen 09:15:40 07/14/01
  • Re: English as a Programming language (off topic) Vincent Diepeveen 00:34:25 07/15/01
    • Re: English as a Programming language (off topic) Heiner Marxen 04:52:01 07/15/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.