Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 12:30:27 07/14/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2001 at 05:01:43, Harald Faber wrote:
>Junior 7 did much better vs. GambitTiger than vs. ChessTiger and often had him
>balancing on the edge. But it is Tigers resistance capability
>that let him escape several times and save the half-points. All in all it was an
>open, equal match with an open exchange of blows. But none
>of them really played convincingly. Assuming that GambitTiger has come back
>after the desaster vs. Shredder 5.32, I still miss sovereign play
>. ChessTiger does much better and plays constant. That and the match results vs.
>Junior 7 and the other opponents both have played in the
>meantime are the reasons why in my humble opinion ChessTiger is the stronger
>engine. But wait for the resting match results, maybe
>GambitTiger can suprise me?! The 5.5-4.5 vs. Junior 7 is no real win, it was an
>equal match which should have ended 5.0-5.0 although an
>5.5-4.5 is still an even result. There are some exciting games with the more
>riskful play by Junior 7 whose playing style is much more
>entertaining than its predecessor's but I got the impression that Junior 7 lacks
>a killer-instinct to finish the impressive games with the
>according result, a win. At the moment I am twisted, on the one hand Junior play
>phantastic games, on the other hand it is often not enough
>to win the game. Maybe vs other opponents than the Tigers?
>
>You find the games at http://www.geocities.com/Harald1312/HaraldFaberE.html
>
>Next match will be vs. Nimzo 8. Let's see how this match goes, both programs
>haven't convinced so far. I expect a result in the range of
>6.0-4.0 up to 7.0-3.0 in favour of GambitTiger. Comparison: ChessTiger won by
>6.0-4.0.
It is always a pleasure to read your comments Harald.
Good work!
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.