Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:36:37 07/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2001 at 05:17:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On July 14, 2001 at 20:05:28, Rafael Vasquez wrote: > >>On July 14, 2001 at 06:06:47, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>Thorsten, >> >>What they llok for after hundreds of games is CONSISTENCY >> >>You and me can eventually play a brilliant game. Any program can do it too. >> >>But a Grandmaster differs in CONSISTENCY >>A stronger program has CONSISTENCY >> >>They get brilliant chess more frecuent. >>That's the secret NOW unveiled. >> >>Rafael > >i am interested in strength. and nimzo8 is stronger. >it is NOT the kure-book. >kure's book IS important, no doubt, but the engine plays better. >if they are uncapable to measure the differences between chess programs, >they should better build a coffee shop or sell beans to the people. >for measuring the differences between engines you need to follow the games and >relate the main lines with each other. the result at the end of the game is only >ONE very small criteria. The problem is that it is possible that Nimzo8 was lucky to get positions that it understands. I agree that seeing games give more information then seeing only results but the problem is that people do not know to get the right conclusions from this information. I believe that 500 results give more information then 10 games even if the people know to get the right conclusions from watching games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.