Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:40:28 07/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2001 at 07:36:37, Uri Blass wrote: >The problem is that it is possible that Nimzo8 was lucky to get positions that >it understands. the way it plays is the way the strength gets realized. the scores, the mainlines, the game. >I agree that seeing games give more information then seeing only results but the >problem is that people do not know to get the right conclusions from this >information. which conclusions do you get from 500 game results ? none. does it tell you what to change ? the weaknesses ? no. it only tells you how much. >I believe that 500 results give more information then 10 games even if the >people know to get the right conclusions from watching games. 500 times throwing bones into the air gives 500 times the information 1-0, 1/2, 0-1. you have 500 events, and get 3 different results. 200 times 1-0 200 times 0-1 and 100 times 1/2. and now ? what conclusions do you get ? >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.