Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:47:56 07/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2001 at 09:07:58, Uri Blass wrote: >I can learn nothing about the style of the program and about the content of the >change without watching games but I can learn if there was a positive or a >negative change more than what I can learn from small number of games. how accurate is the "difference" between 2 programs you measure after hundreds of games ? its wasting time. nor is it true. you cannot differenciate if the engine is really stronger or the book weaker this time, or maybe the learning routine is better. this has nothing to do with the engine itself. how do you want to make sure ? you cannot. its a grand illusion. they make a list, and people believe whats written in this list. its a kind of medicine. when a doctor moves into a certain area of a town, the amount of ill people increases. the higher the number of doctors in a certain area of the country, the more ill the people do become. thats the same effect as the ssdf-list. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.