Author: Frank Phillips
Date: 11:57:55 07/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2001 at 12:24:25, Peter Berger wrote: >On July 15, 2001 at 07:28:46, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>>Fascinating blitz game and good comeback by PM out of a bad position . 32. >>>...Qc8 looks bad and should have been avoided . I checked and Tiger plays that, >>>too at low depths. >>> >4kr2/1b2rp2/2qp3Q/4p2B/Np1bP3/1P3RP1/2PR3P/2K5 b - - am Qc8 >> >> >>Yes. PM only briefly likes it at depth 9, but as luck would have it, >>that's what it came up with in the time available. While watching, I >>was suspicious of this move, because it seems to be at odds to what >>PM was doing in the previous moves. A long think gives 32...Ba6, with a >>score somewhere around -0.6: >> >>12= -52 287 38588438 1... Ba6 2. Kd1 Bb5 3. Qf6 Kd7 4. Qg7 Ke8 >> 5. Bg6 Rc7 6. Ke1 d5 >> >> >>Cheers >> >>Andrew > >I don't like your line very much ; I think 1. ...Bc8 would be a better move but >this is a matter of opinion or would require deeper analysis . > >More interesting is what Searcher missed to finish off PM after the Qc8 mistake, >namely a nice shot at move 36 : > >[D]2q1kr2/3brp2/3R3Q/4p3/Np1b4/1P4P1/2PRB2P/2K5 w - - 0 1 > >Here 36. R2xd4 ed 37. Nb6 + - is a pretty and logical finisher . > >This one _should_ be solvable for some of the better engines even at Blitz time >controls and looks like a good tactical test. > >Cheers. > >pete It is sweet to contemplate from the shore the perils of the sailor struggling with death - A famous quote from Horace that always comes to mind when humans are talking about the mistakes of other humans. Harsh words, but well spotted. Just a few more seconds may have been enough. 1/ 5 30 0.7 21 1. Rd5 1/ 5 130 0.7 102 1. h4 2/ 6 119 0.7 454 1. Nb6 Qc7 3/ 7 119 0.7 2006 1. Nb6 Bxb6 2. Rxb6 Qc5 4/10 105 0.8 14408 1. Bf3 Bb5 2. Be4 Ra7 5/12 116 0.9 68645 1. Bc4 Bxa4 2. Ba6 Qf5 3. bxa4 6/14 102 1.2 191210 1. Ba6 Qc7 2. R6xd4 exd4 3. Rxd4 Qa5 7/16 102 2.3 705392 1. Ba6 Qc7 2. Nb6 Re6 3. Rxe6+ Bxe6 4. Bb5+ Ke7 5. Qg5+ f6 8/19 105 4.0 1552377 1. Rxd7 Re6 2. Qxe6+ fxe6 3. Nb6 Qxd7 4. Nxd7 Kxd7 5. h3 9/19 135 4.9 2038800 1. Ba6 9/19 165 5.7 2415944 1. Ba6 Qc7 2. Rxd7 Rxd7 3. Bb5 Ke7 4. Bxd7 Qxd7 5. Qh4+ Ke8 6. Qe4 10/21 152 8.4 3851780 1. Rxd7 Re6 2. Qg5 Kxd7 3. Nb6+ Rxb6 4. Qxe5 Qc7 5. Bg4+ Kc6 6. Bf3+ Kd7 7. Rxd4+ Kc8 11/23 182 13.0 6202790 1. R2xd4 11/23 241 15.0 7339544 1. R2xd4 exd4 2. Nb6 Qc3 3. Nd5 Qa1+ 4. Kd2 Rxe2+ 5. Kxe2 d3+ 6. Kxd3 Qd1+ 7. Ke3 Qc1+ 8. Kf3 Qxh6 9. Rxh6 12/26 241 23.0 11351493 1. R2xd4 12/26 206 27.4 13898215 1. R2xd4 exd4 2. Nb6 Qc3 3. Nxd7 Qa1+ 4. Kd2 Qc3+ 5. Kd1 Qa1+ 6. Qc1 Qxc1+ 7. Kxc1 Rxe2 8. Nxf8 Kxf8 9. Rxd4 13/26 182 38.0 19614379 1. R2xd4 exd4 2. Nb6 Qc3 3. Nxd7 Qa1+ 4. Kd2 Qc3+ 5. Kd1 Qa1+ 6. Qc1 Qxc1+ 7. Kxc1 Rxe2 8. Nxf8 Kxf8 9. Rxd4 Ke7
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.