Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:50:43 07/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2001 at 15:07:50, Chuck wrote: >On July 15, 2001 at 14:41:08, T. Dex wrote: > >>FOR NOW!!! RebelRex tops ICC blitz. The three games to accomplish that are >>listed as follows. >> > >I don't see why anyone cares about any "no-computers" computer account. > >You completely miss the point of computers playing chess. The computer is an >application of pure logic. Yet a computer that "no-plays" computers is as >illogical a concept as I can fathom. I do not see something illogical with it. People can play comp-comp games at home between the commercial programs and do not need ICC for it. They need ICC mainly for games when humans are involved so if somebody wants to increase the number of games against humans by avoid playing against computers then I see no problem with it. > >Do you shift the rules so encounters are in your favor because you are afraid of >losing? Then, in my opinion, you've already lost. I know that the rating formula is wrong so I do not care about the program that is in the top of ICC. It is simply not important. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.