Author: Fabio Barrettone
Date: 07:14:01 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2001 at 10:04:23, James T. Walker wrote: >Hello Sune, >I understand the statistics and I know I only have 70 games so far. So I'm not >saying that Junior 7 is "XX" points better than Junior 6 or any other program. >At the same time it's hard to ignore the last SSDF list which left Junior 6 >behind Gambit Tiger by over 50 points. In my personal database it may be a >little more than that. The new Junior 7 seems to be more or less equal to >Gambit Tiger (maybe even a little better). I have been watching the games and I >like the way Junior 7 plays. I also liked the way Junior 6 played. Junior 7 >seems more like Gambit Tiger than any other program in some ways. Well, I don't think so. Junior 7 doesn't play as Gambit Tiger at all, it has all a different style. It is now that it attacks as Gambit Tiger but it is a sort of "chaotic" player. It has a very strange evaluation that make it do some phantastic games, also if it play the game quiet. It is very strange to watch Gambit Tiger and Junior 7 play against each other. The first play a very attacking game with an eye always to the opposite king, the second do the same but its moves are still more strange and artistic in mine opinion. I've actually seen boring games played by Gambit Tiger, for now I've never seen a boring game played by Junior 7. If I would know how to play in that way and be stronger the same I will definitely like to play as Junior 7, above all the other choice. I'm truly in love with its style of play, more than Gambit Tiger and Gandalf 5 (this last plays a very beautiful game too). Fabio.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.