Author: Fabio Barrettone
Date: 06:14:46 07/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
>The engines came at the same time so there is no reason to think that Deep >Junior may be better. Yes, I think the same as you for the matter, but the motive for I asked this question is the way things are put at Chessbase. Firstly when the first Deep Junior came out Chessbase said that it was way weaker than Junior 6 with a single processor because it was tuned specifely for more processors. The same is true for Crafty. This time is not so, Chessbase didn't say nothing of the sort, and released also a Shredder 5.32 that it is also a Deep Shredder, and with Junior has not done the same thing. Secondly they seems to treath the two engines as two different ones, as for Deep Fritz and Fritz, no just the one being only a multiprocessor version, this at last is the impression that I've had reading the explanation of it in the Chessbase site, I could, naturally, be wrong in my interpretation. But, for example, if it will come out a Fritz 7 will it be the same engine of Deep Fritz? Where is the non-multiprocessor version of the Deep Fritz that has played for the Kramnik match? Do you think it is the same Deep Fritz that we have? >Deep Fritz is younger than Fritz6 and chessbase also said that it is better so >the situation in that case was different. > This is true, but who knows? Maybe someone that has Deep Junior 7 could say to us if the Deep version using only one processor make the same moves of Junior 7, I would not be too much impressed about it. Fabio.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.