Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 14:38:43 07/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2001 at 16:59:26, Sune Larsson wrote: >On July 18, 2001 at 13:07:01, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>[D]8/1p3kn1/3P3p/1p2P1P1/4K2P/8/8/8 b - - 44...h5 ! creates the winning >>freepawn. >> >>Analyses by shredder: >> >>21 2:28 -3.46 45.Kd5 b4 46.g6+ Kf8 47.Kc4 Se6 48.Kxb4 Kg7 49.Kb5 Kxg6 50.Kb6 >>Kf5 51.Kxb7 Kxe5 52.Kc6 Sf8 53.Kc5 Ke6 54.Kd4 Sd7 55.Ke4 (70.954.038) 477.0 >> 21 3:14 -5.43 45.Kd3 Se6 46.Kc3 Sf8 47.Kb4 Ke6 48.Kxb5 Sg6 49.Kb6 Kd7 >>50.Kxb7 Sxe5 51.Kb6 (91.507.627) 469.8 >> 21 4:49 -6.80 45.Kd4 Se6+ 46.Kc3 Sf8 47.Kb4 Ke6 48.Kxb5 Sg6 49.Kb6 Sxe5 >>50.Kc5 Sg6 (133.608.426) 461.2 >> >>Black wins with the h-pawn.No good day for Hübner.A player for his class should >>see this. > > > Yes, and I was *very* surprised when Huebner played 44.-hxg5. 44.-h5 seemed > obvious and according to his previous moves. As a pure speculation one could > assume that he was tired at this stage. Anyway, a gross mistake in pure > calculation. > > Sune That's the point, Sune. Calculation is a prerogative of the machines: in that field they shines over us. We poor humans , also if brilliant GM , have to count on our intuition to supply to the depth of calculus, but sometimes a precise calculation is necessary, and to follow the sole intuition can lead to an incorrect path. But probably , as you said, it was also a problem of tiredness. Regards.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.