Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:01:27 07/19/01
*DeepFritz(C) - *Huebner(GER) [D]3rr1k1/1pp2ppp/1p1q4/nP1n4/3P2b1/P2QBN2/4BPPP/2R2RK1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Deep Fritz: 19.Rxc7-- ³ (-0.53) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 19.Rfe1 ² (0.28) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 19.Rfe1 ² (0.28) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 19.Rfe1 ² (0.28) Depth: 1/6 00:00:00 19.Rfe1 c6 = (0.09) Depth: 2/7 00:00:00 19.Rfe1 c6 20.Bg5 = (0.09) Depth: 3/15 00:00:00 1kN 19.Rfe1 Nf4 20.Bxf4 Qxf4 21.d5 ² (0.28) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 6kN 19.Rfe1 Nf4 20.Bxf4 Qxf4 21.d5 Qd6 = (0.22) Depth: 5/17 00:00:00 13kN 19.Rfe1 Nf4 20.Bxf4 Qxf4 21.g3 Qd6 22.Ne5 = (0.25) Depth: 6/25 00:00:00 61kN 19.Rfe1-- = (-0.06) Depth: 7/24 00:00:01 204kN 19.Rfe1-- Bh5 20.Nh4 Bxe2 21.Rxe2 = (-0.12) Depth: 7/24 00:00:01 250kN 19.Rce1! = (-0.09) Depth: 7/26 00:00:01 389kN 19.Rce1 Nf4 20.Bxf4 Qxf4 21.h3 Bf5 22.Qc3 c6 = (0.00) Depth: 8/23 00:00:02 1070kN 19.Rce1 Nf4 20.Bxf4 Qxf4 21.Bd1 Bf5 22.Qd2 Qxd2 23.Nxd2 c6 24.Nf3 = (-0.03) Depth: 9/27 00:00:04 2271kN 19.Rce1 Nf4 20.Bxf4 Qxf4 21.Bd1 Bf5 22.Qc3 Be4 23.Ne5 f6 24.Bb3+ = (-0.03) Depth: 10/31 00:00:09 6275kN 19.Rce1 h6 20.h3 Be6 21.Bd2 Nf4 22.Bxf4 Qxf4 23.Qc3 Bd5 24.Ne5 = (0.00) Depth: 11/31 00:00:37 25041kN 19.Rce1 h6 20.h3 Be6 21.Bd2 Nf4 22.Bxf4 Qxf4 23.Qc3 Nb3 24.Ne5 Nd2 = (-0.09) Depth: 12/33 00:01:05 45463kN 19.Bd1! = (-0.06) Depth: 12/37 00:02:26 103608kN 19.Bd1 Bh5 20.Nh4 Bxd1 21.Rfxd1 Re6 22.Nf5 Qd7 23.Re1 Rde8 = (-0.03) Depth: 13/35 00:06:18 270774kN 19.Bd1 Bh5 20.Nh4 Bxd1 21.Rfxd1 Re6 22.Re1 Rde8 23.Nf3 f6 24.Re2 c6 = (-0.03) Depth: 14/38 00:13:56 604485kN (Blass, Tel-aviv 19.07.2001) My Deep Fritz used 64 Mbytes hash tables and pIII800 It cannot see 19.Ng5 in the first 28 minutes. It seems to me that 19.Ng5 is the losing blunder in the game. What is the opinion of your Deep Fritz? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.