Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 04:31:25 07/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2001 at 20:59:08, leonid wrote: >On July 18, 2001 at 18:19:17, Heiner Marxen wrote: [snip] >>Interestingly, without hash for Chest _your_ EBF[T] is significantly better, >>here. Uhh, where did I go wrong? :-) > >Thanks, Heiner! This make me feel better since I had the impression that my >branching was even worse in 8 moves that in 12 moves position. :-) >I still wait that you will put into your solver graphics to make it easy for >direct use. Now, when I like to know something about your program, I must ask >you do it for me. When you will have some graphics, or maybe you could indicate >me some program that use your engin inside (like Hiarcs 7.32 that come with many >engins}, please make me know. Say it for other people as well. I am sure that >your solver is only partially known because of its difficult access. It should >be known more that this because of its rare quality. Yes, got that message already. I will try to make Chest xboard/WinBoard compatible. That would definitely help, I think. But before that there are several other changes to do, like rewriting option parsing (long options), rewriting timing, introducing search failures due to time out, increasing max depth for search and for hash table entries, adding EGTB access and better EPD processing support. I'm also experimenting with better helpmate and selfmate support, have plans for faster processing of stalemate stipulations (happens in problem chess), and have started special draw recognition of things like permanent check. You see, there is a lot to do in not so much spare time. But it is noted and will be done. Have a nice day, -- Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.