Author: Marcus Heidkamp
Date: 05:21:16 07/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2001 at 03:31:08, odell hall wrote: > >I'm Sure Fritz is Number 1, but which ones are second and third? I don't think >large hash tables does much for Century 1, not sure about hiarcs and junior. IMO fast engines, and those who need a lot of researches (like MTD(f) driven ones) exploit larger hash sizes better. But there is no linear dependance between hash size and strength. The first step from no hash to little hash should be biggest, then inreasing hash size should only slightly influence the performance, as long as not too many collisions occur. Marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.