Author: James T. Walker
Date: 18:12:31 07/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2001 at 18:36:18, John Merlino wrote: >On July 20, 2001 at 18:33:15, Steven J. Brann wrote: > >>On July 20, 2001 at 17:48:58, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On July 20, 2001 at 16:49:43, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On July 20, 2001 at 16:27:54, John Merlino wrote: >>>> >>>>>In the first phase of my testing of the mg1 personality, I played 100 games at >>>>>G/10 on the same machine. Here are the results: >>>>> >>>>>MG1 57.5, CM8000 42.5 (+38 =39 -23) >>>>> >>>>>If I recall correctly, this is the best result at G/10 of all personalities that >>>>>I have tested. If anybody would like the PGN file, send me an e-mail.... >>>>> >>>>>I am now going to play 100 games at G/60. >>>> >>>>What is the MG1 personality? >>>>Has it been tried against Chessfun's? >>> >>>The MG1 personality was designed by Bill McGaugh. Here are the settings: >>> >>>A/D (Attack/Defender) [ -5] M/P (Material/Position) [ 5] >>>S/P (Strength of Play) [ 100] C/C (Control of Center) [ 105] >>>Rand (Randomness) [ 0] MOB (Mobility) [ 115] >>>MSD (Max Search Depth) [ 99] K/S (King Safety) [ 150] >>>SS (Selective Search) [ 12] P/P (Passed Pawns) [ 110] >>>C/D (Contempt for Draw) [ 0] P/W (Pawn Weakness) [ 125] >>> >>>OWN OPPONENT >>>Queen [105] Queen [105] >>>Rook [ 54] Rook [ 54] >>>Bishop [ 34] Bishop [ 34] >>>Knight [ 33] Knight [ 33] >>>Pawn [ 10] Pawn [ 10] >>> >>>Opening Book: CM8000.OBK >>> >>>I have not tested it against any other user-defined personality. Normally, I >>>just test against the default and let other people test against other >>>personalities. I'm really only concerned (at this point) if it is better than >>>the default. >>> >>>jm >> >>Hi John, >> >>I presume the ttable size is equal for both personalities, correct?. Is the >>ttable size = default = 1? If not, what ttable size setting? > >I'm using 8MB for the hash tables. > >>Oh, a parenthetical note... better wait for the 1.04 patch before you start the >>G60 tournament or be prepared to let 'er rip for a few days 24/7. <hehe> > >Very funny.... ;-) > >But, yes, I have a machine dedicated to these kinds of things. So it's no >problem. > >jm Hello John, Don't get me wrong, I'm interested in what you are doing but.... I have seen in the past personalities that were tuned to beat the original Chessmaster personality in engine/engine testing but they failed badly vs other top programs at the time. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.