Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Wouldn't the SSDF get more accurate results if a "DEEP" program .....

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 12:10:38 07/21/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 21, 2001 at 14:49:19, Joshua Lee wrote:

>Were is the evidence to support Deep Fritz Being Stronger Than Deep Blue or
>Deeper Blue?

The evidence is the logfiles of deeper blue.
A lot of top programs have no problem to see Qe3 in game 2 of the second match
against kasparov when Deeper blue could not expect this move.

I compared times of Deep Fritz with times of Deeper blue based on the logfile in
order to see the same beginning of the main line in some cases and I found that
deeper blue was only slightly faster than Deep Fritz and it means that Deep
Fritz on better hardware could be faster than Deeper blue.


>
>I would agree if Deep Fritz finds a move that prevents Bxh7+ , which wins for
>white, then we can talk about Deep Fritz being better.

I remember that Deeper blue did not see that Bxh7+ wins so I do not see the
point of this problem.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.