Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 21:41:26 07/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2001 at 23:32:39, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 21, 2001 at 23:28:00, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 21, 2001 at 23:09:18, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>What I found interesting was Shredder 5.32 vs Deep Fritz which is fundamentally >>>the same as Fritz 6 with only minor differences. >>>Deep Fritz pommeled Shredder 5.32 in G/5 but lost badly in a 10 game match at >>>G/60, well Fritz 6 at the same T/C 10 game match nudged a small victory. >>> >>> >>>Terry with the inclusion of Shredder 5.32, Chess Tiger 14.0 and Gambit Tiger II >>>will have a better chance at getting either 1st or 2nd at the SSDF using the >>>newer Athlon 1200 MHz, since Shredder 5.32 at standard time control seems to >>>score pretty good against Deep Fritz, but not against the two BEASTS. >>> >> >>PS: I just tested Shredder 5.32 vs Deep Fritz using my Athlon 800 MHz in a short >>20 games match and the score ended W8 L6 D6 in favor of S5.32, but when I >>tested Chess Tiger 14.0 vs Shredder 5.32 last week the score ended in favor of >>Chess Tiger 14.0 by a small margin W9 L7 D4, and versus GT2 it ended >>in favor of GT2 with a score of W7 L6 D7. > >I forgot to mentioned that the time control was not exactly standard, but game >in 90 Minutes per side. > >>>Pichard. It certainly appears Shredder 5.32 benefits from longer time controls. I also suspect that it will do better than many programs with much faster hardware as it appears to utilize it's _knowledge_ more effectively, thus benefiting more than the _tactically_ based programs, IMO. The Tiger programs notwithstanding. Terry Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.