Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:13:14 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2001 at 15:15:41, Mike S. wrote:
>On July 21, 2001 at 11:35:33, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>(...)
>>But it would be better to demonstrate that in a more valid way.
>
>Here's another one, PII/333 only... but at longer time controls (40 in 10:00).
>Openings were CB's Tiger book with optimized book options.
>
>This time I didn't take at f7 - I was generous and let him do it :o)
>
>[Event "Level=10'/40+5'/20+5'20."]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2001.??.??"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Chess Tiger 14.0"]
>[Black "Scheidl, Mike"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "C65"]
>[PlyCount "28"]
>[EventDate "2001.??.??"]
>
>{96MB, Tiger.ctg. PII/333} 1. e4 {0} 1... e5 {4} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... Nc6 {2} 3. Bb5
>{0} 3... Nf6 {2} 4. O-O {0} 4... Bc5 {5} 5. Nxe5 {0} 5... Nd4 {5} 6. Bc4
>{1.10/11 24} 6... Nxe4 {4} 7. Nxf7 {5.64/10 29}
I don't understand what you want to demonstrate. I know that it is possible to
win against the progs, preferably in shorter time controls. But you should
really use the *ORIGINAL* Tiger book which is provided in the
Chesspartner-package and has 7.c3. Can you imagine that the sense in using
accurate opening books is to not fall into such traps?
7... Qh4 {6} 8. g3 {4.76/12 87}
>8... Qh3 {6} 9. Nxh8 {3.70/11 135} 9... d5 {10} 10. Be2 {2.86/10 11} 10...Nxe2+
>{20} 11. Qxe2 {1.32/12 0} 11... Bg4 {6} 12. Qd3 {-2.10/11 58} 12... Ng5 {12} 13.
>Ng6 {-6.36/11 77} 13... hxg6 {41} 14. Qxg6+ {-6.54/10 0} 14... Nf7 {50} 0-1
>
>I claim a valid victory - after all, I don't force him to fall into those
>traps... :o)
>
>Regards,
>M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.