Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:04:09 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2001 at 05:13:14, Harald Faber wrote:
>On July 21, 2001 at 15:15:41, Mike S. wrote:
>
>>On July 21, 2001 at 11:35:33, Harald Faber wrote:
>>
>>>(...)
>>>But it would be better to demonstrate that in a more valid way.
>>
>>Here's another one, PII/333 only... but at longer time controls (40 in 10:00).
>>Openings were CB's Tiger book with optimized book options.
>>
>>This time I didn't take at f7 - I was generous and let him do it :o)
>>
>>[Event "Level=10'/40+5'/20+5'20."]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "2001.??.??"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Chess Tiger 14.0"]
>>[Black "Scheidl, Mike"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "C65"]
>>[PlyCount "28"]
>>[EventDate "2001.??.??"]
>>
>>{96MB, Tiger.ctg. PII/333} 1. e4 {0} 1... e5 {4} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... Nc6 {2} 3. Bb5
>>{0} 3... Nf6 {2} 4. O-O {0} 4... Bc5 {5} 5. Nxe5 {0} 5... Nd4 {5} 6. Bc4
>>{1.10/11 24} 6... Nxe4 {4} 7. Nxf7 {5.64/10 29}
>
>
>I don't understand what you want to demonstrate. I know that it is possible to
>win against the progs, preferably in shorter time controls. But you should
>really use the *ORIGINAL* Tiger book which is provided in the
>Chesspartner-package and has 7.c3. Can you imagine that the sense in using
>accurate opening books is to not fall into such traps?
Tiger14 is tested with the chessbase book in the ssdf games.
People have a reason to assume that the chessbase book is not inferior relative
to the original book.
The name Tiger.ctg and not general.ctg also suggests that the book is optimized
for tiger.
I guess that these assumptions are wrong but Rebel Company did not do a good job
in convincing the public about it.
They could do a better job by insisting that:
1)only the original book will be used by the ssdf.
2)The name of the chessbase book is going to be general.ctg and not tiger.ctg
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.