Author: Drazen Marovic
Date: 07:01:47 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2001 at 09:37:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 22, 2001 at 08:57:56, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>Not Fritz 7!, Not Deep Fritz!, but Deep Fritz Grandmaster 1.0!! This should be >>the name of the next version of Fritz. Just to take a slap at all of the non >>believers in fritz's grandmaster strength. Mogens you said you didn't believe >>in psychics, but you would believe in amazing luck time and time again, isn't it >>amazing how yet again a non GM strength program could hold a 2600+ GM to an even >>score- just luck i'm sure..... > >I don't believe in amazing luck. I believe in incentive and preparation derived >from the challenge of competition. Since human players don't consider computer >programs as competition, but as an occasional tournament curiosity and perhaps >as an analysis tool, there are only minor incentives. > >This match was supposed to be a competition, but it wasn't. A preseason friendly >you might say. So all in all the usual reasons are still valid and this match >doesn't sway anything IMO. Of course you can disagree all you like, consult >psychics and read tea leaves. It won't help. > >Mogens. Can you see how desperate the claim you are making is, just reaching for any excuse. It's an insult to Huebner to claim that he wasn't taking the match seriously that he wasn't putting forth full effort. Tea leaves is exactly what you are doing the result is the actual proof. What you do is make wild unsubstantiated claims, I.E huebner wasn't trying, all of the players in the recent tournament with Tiger they just were all taking it easy on poor tiger. You can't argue with the actual result. Unless you are reading tea leaves, my psychic freund
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.