Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Not Fritz 7!, Not Deep Fritz!, but Deep Fritz Grandmaster 1.0!!

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 09:04:15 07/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 22, 2001 at 10:01:47, Drazen Marovic wrote:

>Can you see how desperate the claim you are making is, just reaching for any
>excuse.  It's an insult to Huebner to claim that he wasn't taking the match
>seriously that he wasn't putting forth full effort.  Tea leaves is exactly what
>you are doing the result is the actual proof.  What you do is make wild
>unsubstantiated claims, I.E huebner wasn't trying, all of the players in the
>recent tournament with Tiger they just were all taking it easy on poor tiger.
>You can't argue with the actual result.  Unless you are reading tea leaves, my
>psychic freund

There are no desperate claims. Hübner could have drawn DF for a long time
waiting for an opportunity. If it wasn't for a "Rebel like" gift in one of the
games he'd even won the match. And since Hübner isn't a computer specialist nor
a spring chicken, the result can't be labeled as a proof of anything. Give an
upcoming IM the same time for preparation and he/she could do the same. It's
nothing but pure ignorance to claim that this is definite proof of anything.
Unbelievable.

Mogens.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.