Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:04:28 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2001 at 12:04:15, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 22, 2001 at 10:01:47, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>Can you see how desperate the claim you are making is, just reaching for any >>excuse. It's an insult to Huebner to claim that he wasn't taking the match >>seriously that he wasn't putting forth full effort. Tea leaves is exactly what >>you are doing the result is the actual proof. What you do is make wild >>unsubstantiated claims, I.E huebner wasn't trying, all of the players in the >>recent tournament with Tiger they just were all taking it easy on poor tiger. >>You can't argue with the actual result. Unless you are reading tea leaves, my >>psychic freund > >There are no desperate claims. Hübner could have drawn DF for a long time >waiting for an opportunity. If it wasn't for a "Rebel like" gift in one of the >games he'd even won the match. And since Hübner isn't a computer specialist nor >a spring chicken, the result can't be labeled as a proof of anything. Give an >upcoming IM the same time for preparation and he/she could do the same. It's >nothing but pure ignorance to claim that this is definite proof of anything. >Unbelievable. > >Mogens. Clearly a correct argument. Not that I have yet looked at these 6 games, but does anyone have information of the payment received by Hübner. Would he have received more for winning this match?. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.