Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:17:28 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2001 at 14:15:19, John Merlino wrote:
>On July 21, 2001 at 02:05:34, Divy wrote:
>
>>On July 21, 2001 at 01:13:19, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>Yes Kurt, I know where you're coming from. But John, aren't you considering new
>>default personality candidates for say, a new Chessmaster version? In that case,
>>it would make perfect sense to test against default. Perhaps I'm off base here.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Divy
>
>All I do is test. Johan then looks at the results (if he wants to) and then does
>the SERIOUS testing (if it is needed). As far as I know, the only personality
>setting that he has been (seriously) looking at is the King Safety value. Just
>about every personality that has been touted as superior has had a KS value of
>at least 130, and some as high as 170+.
>
>jm
Hi John,
Any idea if he is also looking at the material values as being
something that may change?.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.