Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: show me another game between two GMs that meet these quidelines

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 16:56:43 07/22/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 22, 2001 at 12:08:06, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On July 22, 2001 at 11:36:17, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>do you know of any game where two GMs agreed to a draw that was similiar to
>>this, in a match or tournament.
>>
>>
>>1. less than six (actually there were only four) pieces off the board.
>>2. less than ten moves made.
>>3. an exchange of minor pieces is avoided by move repetition.
>>4. an exchange of pieces is avoided where the next move does not include
>>       a score change. (no score change with 10. Nxd7
>>5. an exchange of pieces is avoided, and a draw is chosen in such a
>>   conservative opening.    caro-kann:steinitz variation.
>>6. an exchange of pieces is avoided, and a draw is chosen when neither
>>      side has a threatening position.
>>
>>
>>
>>here is a final statement that GM huebner made with his board play.
>>
>>     "IF YOU DO NOT GIVE ME THE ADVANTAGE OF Ne5, UNTHREATENED, THEN I
>>        CHOOSE TO NOT CONTINUE THIS GAME".
>
>I do not know whether it was in purpose or not, but Huebner showed a serious
>flaw in fritz (or any other computer perhaps). He could draw whenever he pleases
>and just as easily. I did not think about this, but it could have been
>a nice "match" strategy against a computer. Play in order to have equality
>guaranteed and if you do not like the position to play against the computer,
>take the draw, NOW. He did not play anti-computer in the "classical" way, but
>maybe play "anti-computer" in the way it should be played, the GM way. Solid
>chess using standard openings where the GM has knowledge accumulated for a
>century.
>Yermolinsky wrote something about this in his book.
>
>Regards,
>Miguel
>
*************************
Two points.  First, I think the above statement by Huebner is a nice compliment
to Fritz.  Since it gives the impression that the GM did not want to mix it up
with the computer unless he was spotted a definite advantage.  Second, I can
draw Fritz under the same conditions, that is, the operator accepted a draw
every time it was offered (perhaps under orders of the programmer?)  In my
opinion Huebner showed a lot of respect for Fritz and at the same time showed
very little guts.  I seriously doubt he would do this for any 2400 ELO player.
Jim
************************



>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>   [D] r1bqkb1r/pp1npppp/2p5/4N3/3P4/8/PPP2PPP/R1BQKB1R w KQkq - 0 1
>>
>>
>>kburcham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.