Author: John Merlino
Date: 19:01:22 07/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2001 at 17:17:28, Chessfun wrote: >On July 21, 2001 at 14:15:19, John Merlino wrote: > >>On July 21, 2001 at 02:05:34, Divy wrote: >> >>>On July 21, 2001 at 01:13:19, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>Yes Kurt, I know where you're coming from. But John, aren't you considering new >>>default personality candidates for say, a new Chessmaster version? In that case, >>>it would make perfect sense to test against default. Perhaps I'm off base here. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Divy >> >>All I do is test. Johan then looks at the results (if he wants to) and then does >>the SERIOUS testing (if it is needed). As far as I know, the only personality >>setting that he has been (seriously) looking at is the King Safety value. Just >>about every personality that has been touted as superior has had a KS value of >>at least 130, and some as high as 170+. >> >>jm > >Hi John, > Any idea if he is also looking at the material values as being >something that may change?. > >Sarah. I don't know for sure what Johan is looking at, but I know that the only variable he has discussed with me is the King Safety value. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.