Author: Mark Young
Date: 01:06:20 07/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2001 at 11:17:23, Chris Carson wrote: >I will be sending the entire list to Tony tomorrow. The new list >is broken out by Commercial and Non-Commercial. The Non-Commercial >list will have all the DT, DTII, DB, DBjr games included for a total >of 365 games (commercial and non-commercial). The pgn's will include >all 365 plus the DT/DB vs computer games. > >Also, since I do not post analysis or opinions here, Tony is publishing >my analysis in his e-maililing. I get no money for my analysis and I do >not work for any commercial program or company. > >Here is the latest list for commercial programs on 866mhz and faster, >all games are included: > > W D L Tot >C. Tiger 14 P3 866 2788 2497 8 3 0 11 >D. Junior 6 SMP 8x700 2702 2702 2 5 2 9 >D. Fritz 6 SMP 4x500 2678 2545 6 4 2 12 >D. Fritz 7 SMP 2X1000 2612 2612 0 6 0 6 >Rebel-Cen P3 866 2598 2531 2 3 1 6 >D. Junior 6 SMP 4x500 2635 0 1 0 1 >Reb-Cen K7 1000 2485 0 1 0 1 > 18 23 5 46 Computer programs have now passed every test it seems that people have produced objections for to debunk the above results. 1. Preparation 2. Motivation 3. Quality of players 4. Money 5. Match conditions against strong GM prepared players. 6. Tournament conditions with strong GM players. Even with all the “holes” still left in the modern chess programs play, which the critics of GM level play for computers rightly, point out. It must be noted that the human side has only been able to produced 5 wins against these weaknesses, while the computer side has produced 18 wins against the human weaknesses. This begs the logical question: Which side has more “holes” that need to be fixed, Humans or Computers? > >Ofcourse, I will not respond to any posts here, you will have to read >Tony's letter to get my perspective. > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.