Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 09:43:02 07/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2001 at 11:34:21, Ron Langeveld wrote: >On July 22, 2001 at 09:48:19, Mark Young wrote: > >>On July 22, 2001 at 09:37:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On July 22, 2001 at 08:57:56, Drazen Marovic wrote: >>> >>>>Not Fritz 7!, Not Deep Fritz!, but Deep Fritz Grandmaster 1.0!! This should be >>>>the name of the next version of Fritz. Just to take a slap at all of the non >>>>believers in fritz's grandmaster strength. Mogens you said you didn't believe >>>>in psychics, but you would believe in amazing luck time and time again, isn't it >>>>amazing how yet again a non GM strength program could hold a 2600+ GM to an even >>>>score- just luck i'm sure..... >>> >>>I don't believe in amazing luck. I believe in incentive and preparation derived >>>from the challenge of competition. Since human players don't consider computer >>>programs as competition, but as an occasional tournament curiosity and perhaps >>>as an analysis tool, there are only minor incentives. >>> >>>This match was supposed to be a competition, but it wasn't. A preseason friendly >>>you might say. So all in all the usual reasons are still valid and this match >>>doesn't sway anything IMO. Of course you can disagree all you like, consult >>>psychics and read tea leaves. It won't help. >>> >>>Mogens. > >Way to go Mark! >Mogens actually has a good point here and you can't even come up with a >counterargumentation. I can only feel sorry for people who will defend their new >toy at all costs. If I would want to justify spending my monthly allowance on >any toy, it wouldn' be in any newsgroup. Yes,yes..a toy that will shred you to little pieces at any timing condition... i'm supposing from your harsh tones. Regards.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.