Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 14:03:13 07/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2001 at 16:34:20, Lonnie Cook wrote: >On July 23, 2001 at 13:13:04, Kevin Stafford wrote: > >>>>Kramnik is a positionally player >>> >>>That doesn't mean nothing. >>>Chess is 99% tactics , you can be a very strong positional player but you will >>>fail miserably against a strong tactician. >>> >> >>Well, Kasparov is by all means a strong tactician, and Kramnik faired pretty >>well against him, so your point doesn't really mean much in this context. >> > >right on Kev! That's the first thing I said before even psoting my rebuttal >>-Kevin I repeat, that I didn't say Kramnik isn't a strong tactician, only that at your claim that is a positional player i replied that positional strength is nothing compared to tactics. Thanks for your reply. Regards.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.