Author: John Merlino
Date: 15:42:57 07/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2001 at 18:22:49, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On July 23, 2001 at 12:21:38, odell hall wrote:
>
>>[D] r2qr1k1/pp2ppbp/2p1nnp1/6B1/2PP4/5N1P/PPBQ1PP1/R3R1K1 w - - 0 15
>>
>> Gambit2 Finds this immediately
>>
>>
>>hall,o - Junior 7
>>r2qr1k1/pp2ppbp/2p1nnp1/6B1/2PP4/5N1P/PPBQ1PP1/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
>>
>>1.Bxf6 Bxf6 2.d5 Nc5 3.dxc6 Qxd2 4.Nxd2 bxc6
>> ² (0.40) Depth: 6 00:00:00 95kN
>>1.Bxf6 Bxf6 2.d5 Nc5 3.Rad1 cxd5 4.b4 Na6 5.cxd5
>> ² (0.42) Depth: 7 00:00:00 112kN
>>1.Bxf6 Bxf6 2.d5 Nc5 3.Rad1 cxd5 4.b4 Ne4 5.Qxd5 Qxd5 6.Rxd5
>> ² (0.34) Depth: 8 00:00:01 207kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Re1 Qb6 3.b3 Rad8 4.Rxe6 Rd6 5.Qe3
>> ² (0.48) Depth: 8 00:00:01 260kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Qe3 Qd6 3.Bf4 Qd7 4.Ne5 Qd8 5.Bh6 Bxh6 6.Qxh6 Qxd4
>> ² (0.48) Depth: 9 00:00:02 452kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Qe3 Qd6 3.Bf4 Qd7 4.Ng5 Bh6 5.Nxe6 Bxf4 6.Nxf4
>> ² (0.54) Depth: 10 00:00:03 796kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Qe3 Qd6 3.Bf4 Qd7 4.Ng5 Bh6 5.Nxe6 Bxf4 6.Nxf4 Red8 7.Ne6
>> ² (0.48) Depth: 11 00:00:07 1568kN
>>hall,o - Junior 7
>>r2qr1k1/pp2ppbp/2p1nnp1/6B1/2PP4/5N1P/PPBQ1PP1/R3R1K1 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
>>
>>1.Bxf6 Bxf6 2.d5 Nc5 3.dxc6 Qxd2 4.Nxd2 bxc6
>> ² (0.40) Depth: 6 00:00:00 95kN
>>1.Bxf6 Bxf6 2.d5 Nc5 3.Rad1 cxd5 4.b4 Na6 5.cxd5
>> ² (0.42) Depth: 7 00:00:00 112kN
>>1.Bxf6 Bxf6 2.d5 Nc5 3.Rad1 cxd5 4.b4 Ne4 5.Qxd5 Qxd5 6.Rxd5
>> ² (0.34) Depth: 8 00:00:01 207kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Re1 Qb6 3.b3 Rad8 4.Rxe6 Rd6 5.Qe3
>> ² (0.48) Depth: 8 00:00:01 260kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Qe3 Qd6 3.Bf4 Qd7 4.Ne5 Qd8 5.Bh6 Bxh6 6.Qxh6 Qxd4
>> ² (0.48) Depth: 9 00:00:02 452kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Qe3 Qd6 3.Bf4 Qd7 4.Ng5 Bh6 5.Nxe6 Bxf4 6.Nxf4
>> ² (0.54) Depth: 10 00:00:03 796kN
>>1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Qe3 Qd6 3.Bf4 Qd7 4.Ng5 Bh6 5.Nxe6 Bxf4 6.Nxf4 Red8 7.Ne6
>> ² (0.48) Depth: 11 00:00:07 1568kN
>
>That is quite a beautiful move.
>
>Beowulf plays the cowardly (in comparison):
>g5e3 g8f8 d2c1 d8d7 g1h2 a8d8 c4c5 h7h6 f3e5 d7d5
>
>But I am relieve to see that Phalanx (which has a propensity for brilliant moves
>from time to time) plays the same dull move (with a much better plan):
> 11 106 28454 53104772 Bg5-e3 Qd8-c7 Ra1-d1 Pb7-b5 Pb2-b3 Ra8-b8
> Rd1-b1 Pb5xc4 Pb3xc4 Pc6-c5 Pd4-d5 Ne6-f8
>
>As does ExChess:
> 13. 0.59 412 144845525 1. Be3 Nf8 2. Rad1 Qc8 3. Bf4 Ne6 4. Be5 Nd7 5.
>Bh2 c5 6. dxc5 Rd8 7. Be5 Nexc5
>
>And Amy:
>13 5:40 +0.384 1. Be3 Qc7 2. Qb4 b6 3. Qa3 Rad8 4. Bd3 Nd7 5. Re2 c5 6.
> d5
> 13 38 3400771924835 1. Be3 Qc7 2. Qb4 b6 3. Qa3 Rad8 4. Bd3 Nd7 5.
>Re2 c5 6. d5
>13 7:22 +0.384 1. Be3 Qc7 2. Qb4 b6 3. Qa3 Rad8 4. Bd3 Nd7 5. Re2 c5 6.
> d5
> 13 38 4425895899769 1. Be3 Qc7 2. Qb4 b6 3. Qa3 Rad8 4. Bd3 Nd7 5.
>Re2 c5 6. d5
>
>And Bringer:
>bm Rxe6;
>============ Weiß / white am Zug / to move ===
> sT . . sD sT . sK .
> sB sB . . sB sB sL sB
> . . sB . sS sS sB .
> . . . . . . wL .
> . . wB wB . . . .
> . . . . . wS . wB
> wB wB wL wD . wB wB .
> wT . . . wT . wK .
>target response time (ms): -1
>max. response time (ms): -1
>Static score: mat = 5, pos = 54, total = 59
>0:00:00.1 ( 6/12) 16093 0.52 g5-e3 d8-d6 f3-e5 f6-d7 e5xd7 d6xd7
>0:00:00.3 ( 7/14) 58838 0.60 g5-e3 d8-d6 c4-c5 d6-d5 c2-b3 d5-e4
>0:00:01.2 ( 8/14) 226263 0.45 g5-e3 d8-d6 d2-c3 a8-d8 c4-c5 d6-d5
>0:00:03.2 ( 9/16) 619151 0.51 g5-e3 d8-d6 c4-c5 d6-c7
>0:00:11.2 (10/17) 2018162 0.46 g5-e3 d8-c7
>0:00:41.4 (11/24) 7827912 0.49 g5-e3 d8-c7 d2-d3 a8-d8
>0:01:01.8 (12/24) 11640244 0.45 g5-e3 d8-c7 d2-d3 a8-d8 d3-a3 b7-b6
>a1-d1 e8-f8 a3-b3 c6-c5 d4-d5 e6-f4
>
> 1. g5-e3
>
>
>Crafty [on the other hand] goes for the pedestrian:
>12-> 3:16 0.58 1. Bh4 Nh5 2. Rad1 Qc7 3. Qe3 c5 4.
> d5 Nd4 5. Ba4 Nf5 6. Qg5 Nxh4 7. Nxh4
>
>As does Yace:
> 37523348 1:56.2 0.45 10. 1.Bh4 Nh5 2.Rad1 Qc7
> 102236489 5:26.9 0.50 11t 1.Bh4 a5 2.Rad1 Qb6 3.b3 Red8 4.Bg3 Nd7 5.Qe3H
> Qb4H {HT} {10}
>
>
>Gambit Tiger's move is definitely the most sexy of the lot.
>However, all the programs seem to have a pretty low opinion of their selection.
>Only Phalanx has an eval over one pawn in strength estimation.
CM8000 also prefers "the pedestrian". But it DOES feel pretty good about it
(comparatively):
Time Depth Score Positions Moves
0:00 2/5 1.09 12131 15. Be3 Qd6 16. Rad1 Nd7 17. Qc3 f5
0:00 2/5 1.16 21778 15. Bh4 Qb6 16. b3 Nh5 17. Rad1 Qc7
0:01 2/6 1.15 62789 15. Be3 Qd6 16. Rad1 a5 17. Ng5
Red8 18. Nxe6 Qxe6
0:02 3/7 1.08 122767 15. Be3 Qd6 16. Rad1 Red8 17. Ng5
Nxg5 18. Bxg5 e6
0:06 3/8 1.13 341852 15. Be3 Qd6 16. Rad1 Red8 17. Qa5
b6 18. Qc3 Rac8
0:11 3/8 1.19 612722 15. Bh4 b5 16. b3 Nh5 17. Rad1
bxc4 18. bxc4 Qd6 19. g3 Rab8
0:27 4/9 1.17 1540127 15. Bh4 Qd7 16. Rad1 Rad8 17. Qe3
b5 18. b3 Nh5 19. d5 cxd5 20. Rxd5
1:01 4/10 1.08 3610156 15. Bh4 b5 16. b3 Nh5 17. Rad1
bxc4 18. bxc4 Rb8 19. d5 cxd5 20.
cxd5
jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.