Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:26:36 07/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2001 at 03:03:06, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On July 24, 2001 at 01:14:39, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On July 23, 2001 at 17:25:55, G. R. Morton wrote: >> >>>I seem to have mixed impressions from some of the Info I've read. Opinions? >>>Thanks in advance. >> >>SSDF *pretends* that GambitTiger 2 is stronger, but see that they test >>ChessTiger 14 in the Chessbase-version which has NO ADJUSTED opening book in >>opposite to the Chesspartner-version. And the difference between them in SSDF is >>marginal, so, in spite of less games I think that my tourney says more the >>"truth" than SSDF because in my comparison both Tigers play the same opponents >>(did they in SSDF? I don't think so) and both are the Chesspasrtner-versions >>WITH ADJUSTED opening books. >> >>For more information see http://www.geocities.com/Harald1312/HaraldFaberE.html > >It was a request from Christophe that we tested ChessTiger 14 in the >Chessbase-version and GambitTiger 2 in the Chesspartner-version. WE try to >follow advice from the programmers. Christophe certainly wants to know of the performance of the Chessbase-versions. It is certainly different than the Chesspartner-version. >My next match will be GambitTiger 2 CP - ChessTiger 14 CB, both on A1200. > >Tony Sounds interesting. On the one hand Tiger 14 is the stronger program (:-)), on the other hand Tiger 14 has to suffer from the Chessbase-book...we'll see what counts more. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.